Skip to content | Change text size

M O N A T A R

InfoTech Unit Avatar

FIT3090 ICT Policy Development for Southern Africa

Chief Examiner

This field records the Chief Examiner for unit approval purposes. It does not publish, and can only be edited by Faculty Office staff

To update the published Chief Examiner, you will need to update the Faculty Information/Contact Person field below.

NB: This view restricted to entries modified on or after 19990401000000

Unit Code, Name, Abbreviation

FIT3090 ICT Policy Development for Southern Africa (15 Nov 2005, 7:02pm) []

Reasons for Introduction

Reasons for Introduction (15 Nov 2005, 8:12pm)

Countries in the SADC region are currently grappling with a number of issues relating to ICT policies and working on establishing national and regional policies that are in the best interests of developing countries. There is a need for graduates who understand the process of policy formation and who can contribute to this in a meaningful way. There is currently no unit in the BITS degree that examines these issues and this unit seeks to adress that omission.

Role of Unit (15 Nov 2005, 8:17pm)

This is a third year elective unit in the BITS. It is introduced primarily for students on the South African campus although it may be extended to other campuses if there is a demand. The unit complements the BITS degree with any specialisation since it addresses a need for all IT practitioners to be familiar with policy issues and to be able to critically consider the impact of policy on the implementation, growth and use of ICTs in the region.

Relevance of Unit (15 Nov 2005, 8:19pm)

The School of IT on the South African campus has an obligation to local accrediting authorities to produce local content that is relevant to African graduates. The addition of this unit is in line with that strategy.

Objectives

Statement of Objectives (15 Nov 2005, 9:23pm)

Objectives should be written in terms of learning outcomes for the student.

It is a useful practice to commence an objective with the

words "At the end of this topic / unit a student should "
be able to ...}
Good example: Students will
be able to create and use Oracle database files.
Poor example: To provide examples of three ethical models upon which students can base ethical decisions. (This is poor because it expresses the objective in terms of what the subject will provide, not what the learning outcome for the student will be.)
Poor example: The aim is to learn the specific properties of quantum computing in comparison with randomised computing. (This is poor because it states the objective in terms of a content aim, rather than a learning outcome.)

Objectives should be measurable.

One way of achieving this is to avoid the use of broad or

general terms like "be familiar with, be aware of, "
etc.} If the words "A student should be able to appreciate ..." is used, a list of criteria for
appreciation should be included.
Poor example: A student is able to appreciate a good red wine.
Good
example:} A student is able to appreciate a good red wine
in terms of its colour, amount of fruit, amount of oak, aroma, tannin level and cellaring potential.

Learning Domains for Objectives

There are four learning domains that categorise learning

objectives. You may not have all domains present in your objectives, but they should at least be considered. See below for the four domains.

References:

Bloom, B.S. (Ed) (1956 - 1964). Taxonomy of educational

objectives: the classification of educational goals. Vol 1 & 2.

Simpson, E. (1972). The classification of educational

objectives in the psychomotor domain. The psychomotor domain, vol. 3 Washington, D.C.: Gryphon House.

http://wwww.nwlink.com/~donclark/hd/bloom.html

Knowledge and Understanding (Cognitive Domain Objectives) (15 Nov 2005, 8:30pm)

Knowledge

To make students aware of current developments in national and regional ICT policies in the SADC region.

To make students aware of the elements that could form part of a national ICT policy.

To make students aware of case studies of national ICT policy in other countries and the impact of applying them.

Analysis

To enable students to analyse the policy developments for countries in the SADC region. To enable students to analyse the impact of policies in different countries.

Synthesis

To enable students to adapt and apply lessons learned from ICT policies in other countries to the situation of countries in the SADC region.

Evaluation

To enable students to critically evaluate existing and proposed policies for appropriateness and effectiveness.

Attitudes, Values and Beliefs (Affective Domain Objectives) (15 Nov 2005, 9:08pm)

Students appreciate the importance of policy development in shaping and directing the implementation of ICTs.

Students engage in debate around the value of ICTs for developing countries and the role they ought to play in relation to economic development and quality of life.

Students are able to recognise, compare and critically evaluate the value systems that underlie policies and policy development.

Students are able to articulate their own beliefs and values relating to the role of ICT in the future of the SADC countries and to relate these to policy development for the region.

Practical Skills (Psychomotor Domain Objectives) (15 Nov 2005, 9:16pm)

Students are able to use a variety of sources to find information about ICT policies and the development and impact of policies.

Students are able to read and digest detailed policy documents, identify relevant portions of documents and summarise key points of policy documents.

Students are able to explain policy issues clearly in both written and verbal forms.

Students are able to listen to discussions of policy issues and absorb the information presented verbally.

Relationships, Communication and TeamWork (Social Domain Objectives) (15 Nov 2005, 9:22pm)

Students are able to listen, discuss and argue for particular positions to arrive at a common understanding of issues.

Unit Content

Summary (15 Nov 2005, 8:45pm)

This unit examines the development and implementation of ICT policies at a national and regional level for the South African Development Community (SADC) region. It examines the notion of the digital divide, means of measuring and tracking development in the levels of ICT use and the current ICT infrastructure in use in Africa.

It considers what elements go into policy formulation and examines what policies are in place within SADC countries. It discussed the developments towards regional policies and how they relate to global use and regulation of ICT. It examines case studies of other developed and developing countries to assess the impact of policy on national development priorities.

Teaching Methods

Mode (15 Nov 2005, 8:14pm)

This unit will be taught on-campus.

Assessment

Strategies of Assessment (15 Nov 2005, 9:00pm)

Assignment 60%

Exam (3 hours) 40%

Workloads

Resource Requirements

Prerequisites

Proposed year of Introduction (for new units) (15 Nov 2005, 8:34pm)

Semester 2 2006

Frequency of Offering (15 Nov 2005, 8:38pm)

Once per year

Enrolment (15 Nov 2005, 8:38pm)

30 to 50 students

Location of Offering (15 Nov 2005, 8:35pm)

Monash South Africa campus

Faculty Information

Proposer

Judy Backhouse

Contact Person (15 Nov 2005, 8:36pm)

Judy Backhouse

+27 11 950 4130

judy.backhouse@infotech.monash.edu

Unit Coordinator (15 Nov 2005, 8:37pm)

Judy Backhouse

+27 11 950 4130

judy.backhouse@infotech.monash.edu

Approvals

School:
Faculty Education Committee:
Faculty Board:
ADT:
Faculty Manager:
Dean's Advisory Council:
Other:

Version History

This version: